Bibliography
· http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/shock.html - the website is somewhat reliable as the information is correct, however, there is no author which makes the website invalid.
· http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_3/2.html - the website is reliable as the information is accurate, but there is no author on the website, however, it is published by the website, which makes the website reliable and partially valid.
· http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/injuries_poisoning/electrical_and_lightning_injuries/electrical_injuries.html?qt=&sc=&alt - the website's information is reliable as it is correct and the website is valid as it is copyrighted and published.
· http://www.caresa.com.au/electenerhome.html - the website is reliable as the information is correct and accurate, as well as it being about a syllabus topic, however, there is no author which makes the website invalid.
· http://www.brighthubengineering.com/power-plants/89792-ac-and-dc-shock-comparison/ - the website's information is correct which makes it reliable, and it also has references and has an author, is copyrighted and published, which makes the website reliable.
· http://members.optusnet.com.au/~enochl/docs/pdf/physics/phys_y11circuits.pdf - the website's information is reliable however there is no author or publication details, which makes the website invalid.
· http://esfi.org/index.cfm/page/Tamper-Resistant-Receptacles-(TRR)/pid/11280 - this website is reliable as its information is correct and accurate, and it is valid as it is copyrighted, published, has an author and ends in '.org'
· http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_3/2.html - the website is reliable as the information is accurate, but there is no author on the website, however, it is published by the website, which makes the website reliable and partially valid.
· http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/injuries_poisoning/electrical_and_lightning_injuries/electrical_injuries.html?qt=&sc=&alt - the website's information is reliable as it is correct and the website is valid as it is copyrighted and published.
· http://www.caresa.com.au/electenerhome.html - the website is reliable as the information is correct and accurate, as well as it being about a syllabus topic, however, there is no author which makes the website invalid.
· http://www.brighthubengineering.com/power-plants/89792-ac-and-dc-shock-comparison/ - the website's information is correct which makes it reliable, and it also has references and has an author, is copyrighted and published, which makes the website reliable.
· http://members.optusnet.com.au/~enochl/docs/pdf/physics/phys_y11circuits.pdf - the website's information is reliable however there is no author or publication details, which makes the website invalid.
· http://esfi.org/index.cfm/page/Tamper-Resistant-Receptacles-(TRR)/pid/11280 - this website is reliable as its information is correct and accurate, and it is valid as it is copyrighted, published, has an author and ends in '.org'